Julia Nai

Aishlia - Overview

Aishlia has 22 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.

github.com

Commits · Aishlia/HarmonyOneBot

Contribute to Aishlia/HarmonyOneBot development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

Cultural	Values	Read More	Self Assessment
Empathy	Communicative	conversation turn taking	Score: 6
		disconfirm own beliefs	Score: 9
		self-aware & articulate	Score: 9
	Personal	share a drink	Score: 9
		spend 10 hours daily together	Score: 10
		nurture & mentor	Score: 8
	Collaborative	make everyone shine	Score: 6
		people over process	Score: 6
		dare to disagree	Score: 10
Passion	Devoted	long-time craftsmanship	Score: 6
		obsess over details	Score: 10
		hungry & foolish	Score: 10
	Aligned	share the mission	Score: 7
		optimistic about flying off a cliff	Score: 10
		your 50-year dream	Score: 8
	Authentic	consistent with own actions	Score: 8
		make tough decisions	Score: 9
		admit mistakes	Score: 9
Excellence	Technical	top 1% superstar	Score: 6 What’s Jeffrey Dean’s ATM pin code? The last 4 digits of pi. To be considered in the top of the top percentile in terms of technical skill, one needs to leave a lifetime legacy of brilliant contributions that have pushed the technical world forward. Even if only one or two accomplishments go down in history, every day of their lives is dedicated to pushing the field to new heights out of their own pure desire. I like to think of the greats that line the history of mathematics. I used to hear the same names over and over again in undergrad math classes and wonder to myself how these people could possibly have done so much in one lifetime. But, one professor really illuminated some truths to me. Many of the most famous names in the field were really more than curious. The Bernoullis, Eulers, Leibnitzs etc. of the world dedicated their lives to studying what they loved. When his father told him to become a business man because there is no money in math, Daniel Bernoulli refused. When his father demanded he become a doctor, Bernoulli agreed on the condition he could learn math in private. To strive to be a top 1% superstar is meaningless. The desire to devote yourself to something you love supersedes any forced will-power. Those who are at the top never set out forcing themselves to study to become the best. They found what they loved and were passionate about and being at the top is a lucky byproduct. I love to do many things. Yet, when asked if I would ever get a PhD, I could never say for sure. The thought of spending so many years on one topic invoked a sense of melancholy. I envy those who have found their passion and are more than happy to devote themselves to it. For me, I am still discovering. I do hope that one day I may find the little niche that consumes the rest of my life, but for now, I am more than happy exploring all that there is, the wide breadth of everything-ness.
		effective tooling	Score: 10
		relevant to our needs	Score: 7
	Potential	10x growth	Score: 10
		voracious learner	Score: 10
		contrarian thinker	Score: 10
	Impact	accomplish important work	Score: 7
		activity < productivity	Score: 8
		thrive in chaos	Score: 10 If tech giants have the resources, the recognition, and the talent to do anything and everything, how does any small company stand a chance to compete? The light and sprightly small guy rumbling in chaos without a bureaucratic step in site can pivot and churn out product without a second thought. Chaos, while detrimental if pervasive, provides the perfect breeding ground for spontaneity, innovation, and iteration. I love the chaos of building a product with not enough people, resources, or time. Suddenly, only the best and most important features get pushed in ways that may not be the most resilient, but they work. Iteration after iteration will make things better, but the down and dirty of just getting something out there that just works is truly the best kind of fun.