Team (5 strong yes to hire for permanent)
Bounties (0 yes for 1-time engagement)
Contributors (2 yes for 1-month renewals, 20-hour per week)
DAO (5-of-9 governors for 3-month elections)
Fellows (3 yes for 3-month renewals, full-time)
On tight core groups vs fluid contributions, how to split among the employment structures?
This is tough to wrap my head around. On the one hand, my 10x is expanding the “full-time” Harmony team. So putting a small number under Team and Fellows might contradict my 10x. However, I agree with what Li has mentioned regarding more core/full-time hires, “I’m always most conservative, not about the money, but about diluting the communication and culture...”. Contributors, DAOists, and Bounty hunters will still play a large roll in task management and outreach for Harmony. I’ve said this in another execution strategy poll, but I want to reiterate again. . .I believe these numbers on resource allocations will evolve and scale more to the right of this table as the protocol and the global market matures.